The eccentric SpaceX founder left many individuals questioning aloud about “Carnot effectivity.”
3 min learn
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their very own.
Elon Musk isn’t any stranger to social media. The 49-year-old enterprise magnate, who has practically 49 million followers on Twitter, shares virtually every thing that involves thoughts, from the most recent Tesla updates to random musings.
One latest tweet, nonetheless, has significantly stumped followers. On Monday, the SpaceX and Tesla CEO took to the social media platform to easily ask, “Carnot efficiency of the Universe?” — a query that, as of this writing, has been retweeted greater than 5,000 occasions and generated in extra of 110,000 likes.
Carnot effectivity of the Universe?
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 8, 2021
The tweet has additionally garnered roughly 6,000 responses, some from customers who tried to make sense of Musk’s inquiry.
Associated: Elon Musk Is Creating a City in Texas. It Will Be Called Starbase and It Will Be Ruled by ‘The Doge’
“Elon I’ve two crucial questions,” one individual asked. “1. What’s Carnot? 2. Does Carnot have something to with #dogecoin?”
“I carnot perceive what you are saying,” one other joked.
Not less than one individual, nonetheless, tried to supply some context behind Musk’s tweet by explaining what the Carnot effectivity really is.
“For these questioning, the Carnot Effectivity is the theoretical most effectivity one can get when the warmth engine is working between being too scorching and being too chilly,” the consumer tweeted.
In different phrases, the Carnot effectivity describes the optimum quantity of warmth that may flip into helpful work when a warmth engine runs in between two temperatures.
Some further Twitter customers who appeared to grasp the idea supplied solutions to Musk’s query.
“Fairly darn environment friendly really,” one individual hypothesized. “The Massive Bang had a temperature estimated at 1,000 trillion levels C, and the universe sits at 2.73 Ok at a given time. So just about, Carnot effectivity is 0.99.”
“Massive Bang -> 1-(T2/T1) -> T1 was infinite,” a second suggested. “However then once more, the enclosed quantity was infinitesimally small. And house expands. The entropy and temperature has been lowering ever since. Can not think about Carnot being legitimate on the universe’s scale. (The Massive Crunch state of affairs will differ).”
Regardless of the inflow of theories, one girl appeared to precisely seize most peoples’ sentiments when she replied, “This is beyond science.”
